Mordred did kill him,Lance had fatally wounded him prior to his run-in with his traitorous son,so he was dying ergardless of who finished him off.Nunya B wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 4:31 amBy my understanding of Arthurian myth, Arthur had lost Excalibur and its scabbard when he was fatally wounded and was instead using a spear.MacynSnow wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 1:41 am I can see your argument for "THE SWORD" as a power over the Style idea.But allow me to use a slight counter argument...The sword Excalibur had all that power and Arthur still died when he was dealt a killing blow by Lance-de-Locke (i like the french version of Lancealot's name better than the Americanization,it sounds cooler) using a regular sword.Lance was,according to 99% of all the books i've read,one of the Finest Swordsmen in the group Second only to Gwain The Green.No Powers,just pure skill and advantages(and maybe a Hero Point)...
Then again, I thought Mordred was the one who killed Arthur, so I may be rusty there.
Just remember though that it was Lance who disarmed him,otherwise Mordred would've been beat like a rug on a line...