Reworking M&M 3e skills system
Reworking M&M 3e skills system
Well, as thos who have followed my Overwatch builds series know, I've been tinkering with the M&M skills since I returned. The point is that while I've kind of outgrown the old 2e system, 3e isn't quite right for me.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
Intimidate
I hate Intimidate, I understand it has a place in the triad of Interaction skills (alongside persuade or diplomacy, bluff or deception), but it's like the -- I can't believe I'm about to write this one down -- "special kid" of the bunch. I've lost count of how many systems have rules that sound like "this give a -x penalty to any social skill, except Intimidate". This is probably me, but compared to any other skill Intimidate looks terribly limited: it has just two uses and they are pretty much identical just inside and outside of combat, making it even less appealing to me.
Investigation
This one is pretty easy, but I'd say that deserve a shout out: why is this a single skill and it's not wrap inside Expertise? Every other untrained skill in the 3e system is very generic and it's based on something most people can do or improvise except this one.
That's it for now.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
Intimidate
I hate Intimidate, I understand it has a place in the triad of Interaction skills (alongside persuade or diplomacy, bluff or deception), but it's like the -- I can't believe I'm about to write this one down -- "special kid" of the bunch. I've lost count of how many systems have rules that sound like "this give a -x penalty to any social skill, except Intimidate". This is probably me, but compared to any other skill Intimidate looks terribly limited: it has just two uses and they are pretty much identical just inside and outside of combat, making it even less appealing to me.
Investigation
This one is pretty easy, but I'd say that deserve a shout out: why is this a single skill and it's not wrap inside Expertise? Every other untrained skill in the 3e system is very generic and it's based on something most people can do or improvise except this one.
That's it for now.
- Batgirl III
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:17 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
Acrobatics and Athletics could probably be “folded into” one skill without too great a disruption. I’d default to Strength-based as Agility is otherwise a bit too useful a stat.
Intimidate is fine, as is, you just need to give players a chance to use it more. Let them “sweat a perp” every now and then. (Also, remove – or severely restrict – the Fearless Advantage!)
Expertise [Forensics] seems like a sensible substitute for Investigation. I suspect it is a unique skill solely due to the importance of criminal science and detective work in the superhero genre. I mean, one of the most famous superheroes does star in Detective Comics after all.
Intimidate is fine, as is, you just need to give players a chance to use it more. Let them “sweat a perp” every now and then. (Also, remove – or severely restrict – the Fearless Advantage!)
Expertise [Forensics] seems like a sensible substitute for Investigation. I suspect it is a unique skill solely due to the importance of criminal science and detective work in the superhero genre. I mean, one of the most famous superheroes does star in Detective Comics after all.
BARON wrote:I'm talking batgirl with batgirl. I love you internet.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
That was my idea as well, maybe I can add an Acrobat feat to shift the skill to Dex.Batgirl III wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 5:26 pm Acrobatics and Athletics could probably be “folded into” one skill without too great a disruption. I’d default to Strength-based as Agility is otherwise a bit too useful a stat.
I'm still not 100% on borad with this, but it's probably just me trying to overthinking things.Batgirl III wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 5:26 pmIntimidate is fine, as is, you just need to give players a chance to use it more. Let them “sweat a perp” every now and then. (Also, remove – or severely restrict – the Fearless Advantage!)
That's probably the case, although it's kind of funny how this seem to depend mostly on the publisher. I think you said it once: DC has a crapton of Detectives, Marvel a crapton of scientists.Batgirl III wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 5:26 pm Expertise [Forensics] seems like a sensible substitute for Investigation. I suspect it is a unique skill solely due to the importance of criminal science and detective work in the superhero genre. I mean, one of the most famous superheroes does star in Detective Comics after all.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
BTW, Fearless was banned from my table almost a decade ago and replaced with Lionheart.
- Batgirl III
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:17 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
That was my approach.
BARON wrote:I'm talking batgirl with batgirl. I love you internet.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
In my opinion,Acro(my shorthand for Acrobatics) should be,and is in my games unless stated otherwise,restricted to only those heroes/villians with Agility higher than 2.My reasoning for this is simple;no 2 people have the exact same skills irl,so neither should the folks in the game world.An example i always use to illustrate this is push-up&sit-ups:the more sit-up's you can do,the less push-up's you can do.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Well, as thos who have followed my Overwatch builds series know, I've been tinkering with the M&M skills since I returned. The point is that while I've kind of outgrown the old 2e system, 3e isn't quite right for me.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
Intimidate
I hate Intimidate, I understand it has a place in the triad of Interaction skills (alongside persuade or diplomacy, bluff or deception), but it's like the -- I can't believe I'm about to write this one down -- "special kid" of the bunch. I've lost count of how many systems have rules that sound like "this give a -x penalty to any social skill, except Intimidate". This is probably me, but compared to any other skill Intimidate looks terribly limited: it has just two uses and they are pretty much identical just inside and outside of combat, making it even less appealing to me.
Investigation
This one is pretty easy, but I'd say that deserve a shout out: why is this a single skill and it's not wrap inside Expertise? Every other untrained skill in the 3e system is very generic and it's based on something most people can do or improvise except this one.
That's it for now.
I always think a good Batman-typ dude should be able to use intimidate to replace the Persuasion & Investigation requirements for the Contact and Connected advantages,as there's nothing faster to get a mook talking than holding him over the edge of a 15+ story building and threatening to let go......
The reason i think Investigate isn't hooked into Expertise is probably due to how it's been portrayed in Movies,T.V. shows,books,etc. Forensics,to borrow a little from bgIII,could be lumped into Expertise due to the fact that it's more of the scientific approach rather than Investigation,which would be considered more of an Empathic&Sensory thing....
Anyhoot,just thought I'd drop my 2 nickles into this.Later!
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
I could see them being wrapped together and then just Str or Dex be used depending on what they're trying to do. Need to book it and power jump over an alley? Str-based. Want to bounce down the same alley way to reach the ground? Dex/Agi.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Well, as thos who have followed my Overwatch builds series know, I've been tinkering with the M&M skills since I returned. The point is that while I've kind of outgrown the old 2e system, 3e isn't quite right for me.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
Yea, Intimidation is kind of weird. It's just persuade, but you're acting mean about it.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Intimidate
I hate Intimidate, I understand it has a place in the triad of Interaction skills (alongside persuade or diplomacy, bluff or deception), but it's like the -- I can't believe I'm about to write this one down -- "special kid" of the bunch. I've lost count of how many systems have rules that sound like "this give a -x penalty to any social skill, except Intimidate". This is probably me, but compared to any other skill Intimidate looks terribly limited: it has just two uses and they are pretty much identical just inside and outside of combat, making it even less appealing to me.
I'd say because Expertise is a catch all for what other skills don't cover and that investigations happen enough in comics that they wanted a more in-depth system for it.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Investigation
This one is pretty easy, but I'd say that deserve a shout out: why is this a single skill and it's not wrap inside Expertise? Every other untrained skill in the 3e system is very generic and it's based on something most people can do or improvise except this one.
Formerly luketheduke86
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
The problem is that M&M isn't really suited to handle dual-stats skills, but this might be a good model.L-Space wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:49 amI could see them being wrapped together and then just Str or Dex be used depending on what they're trying to do. Need to book it and power jump over an alley? Str-based. Want to bounce down the same alley way to reach the ground? Dex/Agi.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Well, as thos who have followed my Overwatch builds series know, I've been tinkering with the M&M skills since I returned. The point is that while I've kind of outgrown the old 2e system, 3e isn't quite right for me.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
I think that the reason I went down on Expertise is that I can think of at least 3 Expertise (Law Enforcement, Private Investigator and Forensinc) that cover the same niche and I can't really think of many characters that make use of it without some kind of training in the matter. Batman (arguably the most notorious comic book detective) has a specific training in it which smell more of Forensic to me, same with characters like Elongated Man or Angel & the Ape. The only two character I can think of that might fit the bill are Martian Manhunter and Mr.Terrific, who are both massive skillmonkeys.L-Space wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:49 amI'd say because Expertise is a catch all for what other skills don't cover and that investigations happen enough in comics that they wanted a more in-depth system for it.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Investigation
This one is pretty easy, but I'd say that deserve a shout out: why is this a single skill and it's not wrap inside Expertise? Every other untrained skill in the 3e system is very generic and it's based on something most people can do or improvise except this one.
A similar argument can be made about Medicine/Treatment, but I can think of a little more professionals that have a modicum of it without being professionally trained (soldiers, scoutmasters etc.)
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
I like the idea of varying the ability used for skill checks based on what you're trying to do. The book hints at it a little in the description of the Expertise skill and I think you could expand the idea to other skills easily.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:19 amThe problem is that M&M isn't really suited to handle dual-stats skills, but this might be a good model.L-Space wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:49 amI could see them being wrapped together and then just Str or Dex be used depending on what they're trying to do. Need to book it and power jump over an alley? Str-based. Want to bounce down the same alley way to reach the ground? Dex/Agi.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 4:23 pm Well, as thos who have followed my Overwatch builds series know, I've been tinkering with the M&M skills since I returned. The point is that while I've kind of outgrown the old 2e system, 3e isn't quite right for me.
There are a number of kinks I want to hammer out and I really need some input.
Acrobatics vs Athletics
Okay, since we are opening a can of worm let's go big. While Athletics is a massive improvement over the old Climb+Swim+whatever we used, it has one major problem: in any game I've ever run there were player who argued to death over which skill was the most appropriate to use in any given moment. thing is that the two skills overlaps a lot even in comics (Nightwaing for example is considered a Dex-Monkey, but he should be extremely strong too). I would love to find a way to bypass this one completely, but I just can't find a way to do it.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
The problem is that Expertise works on the principle of using a different stat depending on the skill in question, but always the same. I don't think that the system can easily handle a dynamic change all that well.Shock wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:00 pmI like the idea of varying the ability used for skill checks based on what you're trying to do. The book hints at it a little in the description of the Expertise skill and I think you could expand the idea to other skills easily.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
I don't see anything in the system that prevents it. The GM assigns an appropriate ability for each check and you add your skill bonus. It's just a little bit extra math rather than having the number directly on your character sheet.Woodclaw wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:42 pmThe problem is that Expertise works on the principle of using a different stat depending on the skill in question, but always the same. I don't think that the system can easily handle a dynamic change all that well.
- Batgirl III
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:17 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
I’ve been doing it since M&M1e... and before that I was doing it for years with D&D3e. It’s one of my few standing House Rules.The problem is that Expertise works on the principle of using a different stat depending on the skill in question, but always the same. I don't think that the system can easily handle a dynamic change all that well.
BARON wrote:I'm talking batgirl with batgirl. I love you internet.
-
- Posts: 2403
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:20 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
The chief problem is PL caps. If you have an athletic guy with the proposed merged skill, say at 12 ranks at PL 10, are his Strength and Agility limited to a maximum of 8, since both now possibly factor into the total?
- Batgirl III
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:17 am
- Location: Portland, Oregon
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
I base the PL caps on the standard Attribute/Skill combination, since the use of a non-Standard Attribute/Skill combo will only happen when the GM calls for it (or a player suggests it, but the GM still has to allow it) and such situations don’t come up nearly as often as standard.FuzzyBoots wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 5:46 pm The chief problem is PL caps. If you have an athletic guy with the proposed merged skill, say at 12 ranks at PL 10, are his Strength and Agility limited to a maximum of 8, since both now possibly factor into the total?
If a PC’s concept does call for a specific non-Standard Attribute/Skill combo as part of their regular build – a Presence-based Expertise for a musician or an Awareness-based Treatment for a faith healer – then this can Ben handled as a 0 PP or 1 PP Feature.
BARON wrote:I'm talking batgirl with batgirl. I love you internet.
Re: Reworking M&M 3e skills system
That was my logic as well with the idea of using a Feat/Advantage.Batgirl III wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 6:01 pmI base the PL caps on the standard Attribute/Skill combination, since the use of a non-Standard Attribute/Skill combo will only happen when the GM calls for it (or a player suggests it, but the GM still has to allow it) and such situations don’t come up nearly as often as standard.FuzzyBoots wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 5:46 pm The chief problem is PL caps. If you have an athletic guy with the proposed merged skill, say at 12 ranks at PL 10, are his Strength and Agility limited to a maximum of 8, since both now possibly factor into the total?
If a PC’s concept does call for a specific non-Standard Attribute/Skill combo as part of their regular build – a Presence-based Expertise for a musician or an Awareness-based Treatment for a faith healer – then this can Ben handled as a 0 PP or 1 PP Feature.