Page 2 of 2

Re: M&M 2.5

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:47 pm
by badpenny

Re: M&M 2.5

Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 11:16 pm
by L-Space
badpenny wrote:It's only cosmetic though. Many of the changes I'm after are because I feel the existing game mechanics are broken. For example, I had to change how Attack was handled because being effect-shifted is objectively better than being attack-shifted in the RAW.
Fair enough. Just figured it made it easier to keep track.
badpenny wrote:3e broke more things than it fixed, but YMMV on that opinion.
Really, how so? Not trying to start an argument, just wondering your side of things.

Re: M&M 2.5

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 1:05 am
by badpenny

Re: M&M 2.5

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:44 pm
by MacynSnow
I can see where the Argument Lies(i have 1e,the Archtypes Book for 2e & the Hero's Handbook for 3e.I also have the Original 1e Freedom City Book&the First Time of Crisis),but i still tend to use the "-2 on Checks" you mentioned for ALL Check's (of course,i got into Tabletop RPG's by way of D&D 2E,so i'm used to the heavy math)...

Re: M&M 2.5

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:27 pm
by badpenny